diff --git a/Minecraft.World/Hasher.cpp b/Minecraft.World/Hasher.cpp
index 45c933f..a058030 100644
--- a/Minecraft.World/Hasher.cpp
+++ b/Minecraft.World/Hasher.cpp
@@ -20,7 +20,11 @@ wstring Hasher::getHash(wstring &name)
 		//return new BigInteger(1, m.digest()).toString(16);
 
 		// TODO 4J Stu - Will this hash us with the same distribution as the MD5?
+#if _MSC_VER >= 1900
 		return _toString( std::hash<wstring>{}( s ) );
+#else
+		return _toString( stdext::hash_value( s ) );
+#endif
 	//}
 	//catch (NoSuchAlgorithmException e)
 	//{
diff --git a/Minecraft.World/Player.cpp b/Minecraft.World/Player.cpp
index d4832e4..7bf7714 100644
--- a/Minecraft.World/Player.cpp
+++ b/Minecraft.World/Player.cpp
@@ -2560,9 +2560,11 @@ int Player::hash_fnct(const shared_ptr<Player> k)
 	// TODO 4J Stu - Should we just be using the pointers and hashing them?
 #ifdef __PS3__
 	return (int)boost::hash_value( k->name ); // 4J Stu - Names are completely unique?
-#else
+#elif _MSC_VER >= 1900
 	return (int)std::hash<wstring>{}( k->name ); // 4J Stu - Names are completely unique?
-#endif //__PS3__
+#else
+	return (int)stdext::hash_value( k->name ); // 4J Stu - Names are completely unique?
+#endif
 }
 
 bool Player::eq_test(const shared_ptr<Player> x, const shared_ptr<Player> y)